Fiduciary duty bill could kill DOL rule
Assistant Labor chief Borzi says bill won't slow her
efforts
By Mark Schoeff Jr. | June 18, 2013 - 4:20 pm EST - InvestmentNews
The House Financial Services Committee is scheduled to vote Wednesday on
legislation that would require the Securities and Exchange Commission and the
Labor Department to coordinate their efforts to strengthen investment-advice
rules. But some observers say coordination is likely to mean the end of the
DOL's efforts.
gThis bill clearly would delay the DOL from moving ahead in the near term
with fiduciary rule making under [federal retirement law],h said Neil Simon,
vice president of government relations at the Investment Adviser Association.
In fact, it could stop it altogether.
gConsider a scenario in which the SEC decided not to promulgate a rule,h said
Marilyn Mohrman-Gillis, director of public policy and communications, at the
Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards Inc. gIt could prevent the
Department of Labor from engaging in rule making.h
The bill was introduced in May by Rep. Ann Wagner, R-Mo., as a discussion
draft. In converting the measure to formal legislation, Ms. Wagner sharpened
language pertaining to the SEC's and DOL's work on separate fiduciary-duty
rules.
Under Ms. Wagner's bill, the Labor Department would be prohibited from
proposing a rule that would expand the definition of gfiduciaryh as it applies
to anyone providing investment advice to retirement plans such as 401(k)s until
60 days after the SEC proposes a separate uniform fiduciary duty rule for retail
investment advice.
That won't stop Assistant Labor Secretary Phyllis Borzi, who has been the
driving force behind the DOL fiduciary rule.
While Ms. Borzi declined to comment specifically on Ms. Wagner's bill, she
told reporters on the sidelines of an Insured Retirement Institute conference in
Washington Tuesday that DOL will forge ahead with its rule, which she sees as
important for protecting workers from conflicted advice about retirement plans
that many now have to manage on their own.
She noted that the DOL is working independently of the SEC.
gOf course not,h she said when asked if DOL would wait on the SEC. gWe're
coordinating very closely with the SEC to make sure we don't have outright
conflicts.h
The DOL is expected to re-propose its rule in the next couple months. The SEC
is not nearly as far along. It is collecting information to conduct a
cost-benefit analysis that would help the agency determine whether to propose
its own fiduciary-duty rule.
Unlike the discussion draft, Ms. Wagner's formal bill specifically mentions
the DOL and outlines a timetable. The bill also has been submitted to the House
Education and Workforce Committee, which has jurisdiction over the Labor
Department.
The DOL first issued its fiduciary proposal in 2010. It was withdrawn after
fierce financial industry protest against provisions that would have for the
first time subjected brokers selling individual retirement accounts to the more
stringent fiduciary requirements.
Opponents of the DOL fiduciary rule have warned that the rule and the SEC
fiduciary rule for investment advice could overlap, causing compliance
difficulties for brokers. The DOL proposal has drawn bipartisan opposition on
Capitol Hill.
Ms. Wagner's bill also addresses the SEC's potential rule. It would require
that the agency determine whether investors are currently being harmed by the
differing advice standards that advisers and brokers meet and assess whether a
uniform standard would limit investor access to advice. Under current law,
advisers must act in the best interest of their clients, while brokers meet a
less stringent suitability standard when selling investment products.
Unlike the discussion draft, the formal bill does not require the SEC to
harmonize broker-dealer and adviser regulations on registration, supervision and
examination before advancing a uniform standard.
That development pleased adviser advocates, who see gharmonizationh as a code
word for halting a uniform standard.
gIt is nowhere near as threatening as the provision that was in the
discussion draft,h Mr. Simon said.
The House financial committee is likely to approve the bill, which would send
it to the House floor for a vote by the full chamber.
Even though its prospects in the Senate appear poor, parts of the bill --
including the harmonization requirement -- could wind up in other proposals.
What's more, the measure might send a very skeptical signal to the SEC and DOL
about their fiduciary rules.
gIt could make the agencies that much more cautious in the manner in which
they proceed,h Mr. Simon said.